Feature

Advanced Stenting Strategies for Complex Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions

Cary Lunsford, RCIS, FSICP, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Whittier, California

Cary Lunsford, RCIS, FSICP, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Whittier, California

Continuing Education Information Learning Objectives: Upon completion of this educational activity, participants should be able to: 1) Describe some of the root causes of side branch failure when stenting bifurcation lesions 2) Recognize different bifurcating lesion morphologies 3) Recognize which strategy that should be utilized as most optimal for a successful outcome. Credits: Physicians 1 AMA Category 1 credit Nurses 1 Contact Hours Technologists 1 AMA Category 1 credit Method of Participation: Read the journal article, complete the post-activity test and evaluation and mail or fax it to: North American Center for CME 83 General Warren Blvd. #100 Malvern, PA 19355 Fax: (610) 560-0501 Successful Completion: Successful completion entails participants obtaining a score of at least 70% on the post-test. A certificate of completion will be mailed to the address listed on your post-test/evaluation form within 6 weeks of receipt of the documents. Accreditation: MD/DO: This activity is sponsored by the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education (NACCME) NACCME is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. NACCME designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) Each physician should claim only those credits that he/she actually spent in the educational activity. This activity has been planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essential Areas and Policies. Nurses: ANCC: North American Center for Continuing Medical Education is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the Pennsylvania State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation. This continuing nursing education activity was approved by the PA State Nurses Association for 1 contact hour(s). Provider #: 110-3-E-03. Provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number 13255 for 1 contact hours. Technologists: Radiologic Technologists: Activities approved by the American Medical Association (AMA Category 1) are eligible for ARRT Category B credit as long as they are relevant to the radiologic sciences. Radiologic Technologists, registered by the ARRT, may claim up to 12 Category B credits per biennium. Off-Label Disclosures: This educational activity contains discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. Neither the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, nor Boston Scientific recommends the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. Faculty Disclosures: All faculty participating in Continuing Education programs sponsored by the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education are expected to disclose to the meeting audience any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest related to the content of their presentation. It is not assumed that these financial interests or affiliations will have an adverse impact on faculty presentations; they are simply noted here to fully inform participants. Mr. Lunsford has disclosed that he has no financial relationships or conflicts of interest regarding the content herein. Commercial Supporter: This activity is supported by an educational grant from Boston Scientific. Conflict of Interest Resolution/Content Validation: In compliance with ACCME Standards for Commercial Support and NACCME’s policy and procedure for resolving conflicts of interest, this continuing medical education activity was reviewed by Dr. Vernon Anderson in May 2006 for clinical content validity, to insure that the activity’s materials are fair, balanced and free of bias toward the commercial supporter(s) of the activity, and that activity materials represent a standard of practice within the profession in the US and that any studies cited in the materials upon which recommendations are made are scientifically objective and conform to research principles generally accepted by the scientific community. Sponsor: North American Center for Continuing Medical Education _____________________________________ Percutaneous coronary stenting of bifurcation lesions constitute a challenge for interventional cardiology. It is continuously a main focus of discussion among invasive cardiologists, and has been for over 20 years. There are a few root causes of side branch failure: strut jailing of the side branch, incomplete coverage of a gap with a drug-eluting stent (DES), barotrauma from angioplasty of the side branch, and neointimal proliferation, affecting late loss. Bifurcation lesions are complex, can be very time-consuming and costly, and carry a high risk of restenosis. Despite refinement of the advanced technology and techniques we now have in our interventional cache, the surgeons are still procuring a considerable piece of the pie! This article is not intended in any way to be an academic or scientific study on bifurcation intervention. It is rather an informal tool on the various strategies that interventionalists are now using to approach various bifurcating lesions. While you are reading these various strategies, keep in mind that these are very basic instructions, and every operator has his or her own technique and level of expertise. Some of these strategies overlap into others. The names we have given each of these strategies can vary from one operator to the next, as the standardization of each strategy is yet to be recognized. There will always be different opinions, but most interventionalists will agree on these basic concepts. The strategies we will explain are: T stent V stent Y stent Double Barrel or Double D Trousers or Culotte stent Crush stent The Back-stop technique The Tail-Wire (or Szabo) technique It is important to note the angulation of the bifurcation, as it will dictate how to approach the lesion. All strategies present their own level of expertise and some are more challenging due to lesion-specific complexities. Part of the caveat of bifurcation angioplasty or stenting is the snowplow effect, or axial plaque redistribution.1 This is caused by the balloon or stent shifting the plaque to the area of least resistance. Unfortunately, this area tends to be in the ostium of a branch. It can cause a relatively simple angioplasty to become complex, with major consequences. The following strategies can alleviate some of the undesirable problems that can occur during bifurcation stenting. T Stent The T stent2 strategy (Figure 1) is a strategy well suited for when the side branch originates from the main branch at an angle between 60˚ and 90˚ at the carina. In a lesion with the angle less than 60˚, there might be too large an unstented gap at the side branch ostium that would be undesirable for the overall success of the procedure. The T stent strategy consists of two stents, one in the side branch in a T-shaped configuration. The side branch is usually pre-dilated first. Some operators prefer to do provisional stenting of the side branch if the angioplasty had a sub-optimal result. If a stent is required in the side branch, there are two options. The first option is to stent the main branch, rewire the side branch through the strut, inflate through the stent, then stent through the strut. The second option is to stent the side branch first, carefully cover the ostium, and have minimal strut protruding into the main branch. The backstop technique6 (described later) can help position the stent precisely. Most operators agree that optimal pre-dilatation be obtained before stent delivery and a kissing balloon should follow stent delivery. Role of the Jailed Wire Technique in T stenting. Some operators are using this technique in T stenting for three reasons.1 First, the guidewire, left in place in the side branch, can favorably modify the angle of both branches and enable the operator to pass the third wire through the strut into the side branch. Second, the jailed wire can help keep the side branch open when stenting the main branch. Third, the risk of jailed wire rupture during pullback is low unless a hydrophilic wire is being utilized. V Stent The V Stent1,11 (Figure 2) consists of two stents positioned and inflated, simultaneously or not, at each ostium. The lesions should first be prepared by re-dilatation. In this approach, a wire is not needed to pass through a stent strut. Some operators are extending the two stents side by side proximally up the main branch in a double-barrel fashion (a technique that will be explained later.) Y Stent The Y Stent11 (Figure 3) consists of adding a stent in the main branch proximal to the V stents already deployed. This technique often leaves an unprotected gap near the carina devoid of the benefit of a DES. A Modified Y technique was described to us by Dr. Richard Fortuna (Scripps, La Jolla, Ca.) Dr. Fortuna is a very high-volume operator, and comments that his technique is easy, quick, and he has great acute and long-term results. His technique is as follows: Wire both the main and side branch, then stent the main branch and rewire the side branch (thus removing the original wire). Next, dilate the side branch ostium, bring a stent into the side branch ostium and at the same time, put a post-dilatation balloon in the main branch. Deploy a side branch stent and post dilate at same time. There is complete coverage of side branch ostium with minimal overlap of metal and the deployment can be the final kiss. Double Barrel or Double D Stent This strategy (Figure 4) is also a form of the V Stent, and has also been called Simultaneous Kissing Stents.4 It is basically the same as the V stent,3 except that the stent in the side branch and the stent in the main branch extend proximally up the main branch together, in a double-barrel configuration. These stents are often inflated simultaneously at nominal atmospheres, but a new technique was explained at the 2005 Scripps Interventional Course (Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California) suggesting that simultaneous kissing of the stents might not allow optimal flush opposition to the wall. Some operators are now alternating low and high inflation atmospheres between the side branch and main branch to get a more flush opposition to the intimal wall with the stents. An example of this would be to inflate both stents simultaneously with the side branch at five atmospheres (atm), the main branch at 11 atm, then alternating one more time with the side branch at 11 atm, and main branch at 5 atm. A final kissing inflation should be done simultaneously with both at low atmospheres. Trousers or Culotte Technique This is a very complex strategy3,5,6,8 that consists of deploying a stent in the main branch, wiring through a strut to the side branch and after pre-dilation to the side branch, removing balloon and wire from the main branch and stenting through to the side branch (Figure 5). The main branch is again rewired and pre-dilated with a balloon, and both side branches and main branch stents are finalized with simultaneous kissing balloons. Given that this strategy is time-consuming and has reportedly poor results due to sub-optimal flush opposition with excess metal,1 it is slowly losing popularity. Crush Technique The Crush Technique3 (Figure 6) consists of positioning both stents in the bifurcation with the side branch stent overlapping into the main branch. After deployment of the stent in the side branch, balloon and wire are withdrawn from the side branch. The stent in the main branch is inflated and crushes the part of the side branch stent that is overlapping into the main branch. Optimal results are then achieved when the side branch is re-wired and a final kissing balloon inflation is performed at the bifurcation. Backstop Technique This technique7 (Figures 7“8b-v) helps to position the ostial stent of the main branch stent without having to use two stents at the bifurcation. It also helps to eliminate the undesirable effect of snowplowing plaque into the ostium of a clean vessel when the balloon is inflated in a lesion on the bifurcation. This method consists of the placement of two guidewires in both vessels (main and side branch). A stent is then positioned carefully at the stenotic site at the bifurcation. The plain balloon is then positioned half in the side branch and half in the main vessel. It should be purposely undersized as not to disrupt the intimal wall. Some operators prefer to simultaneously inflate the balloon and stent (balloon at low atmospheres, stent nominal atmospheres). Other operators are inflating the balloon first, slightly pulling on the uninflated stent until some resistance is felt, then inflating the stent. This technique avoids the plaque shift and saves the healthy branch from having to be stented. It is also cost-effective and eliminates a very complex bifurcation kissing stent procedure. Tail-wire (Szabo) Technique This very unique technique9,10 (Figure 9) was described to me by Sharon Bosler, RT. She witnessed Dr. Morton Kern perform this procedure at Irvine Regional Medical Center in Irvine, California. In a paper from the 2005 TCT meeting in Washington D.C., presented by S. Szabo et al., he recently described this technique. After wiring the aorto-ostial lesion, a second angioplasty guide wire is positioned in the aorta to anchor to the stent at the ostial lesion by passing the proximal end of the anchor wire through the last cell, or strut of the stent. Dr. Kern advises the use of a short wire that is capable of docking, or connecting to another wire, as this has a tapered tip at the end that helps you to thread through the strut. The stent then travels over both the primary wire into the artery and over the anchor wire, which stops the forward motion of the stent at the aorto-ostial junction. The stent is then deployed at low atmospheres. The tail wire is rewired and the stent is inflated at high atmospheres. This technique can also be used in ostial-bifurcating lesions (Figure 10): A. The stent is advanced over both the primary wire and the anchor wire which resides in the other branch. B. The stent is advanced into the ostial lesion. C. The stent advancement is stopped by the anchor wire and then deployed at low atmospheres. The anchor wire is removed and the stent is then inflated at high atmospheres. This gives the operator an accurate and precise ostial stent placement. (My thanks to Dr. Morton Kern for allowing me to describe this very novel technique, and my good friend Laura Minarsch, who helped me with this resource.) Conclusion The future will be the true test for these techniques. Although coronary artery bifurcation can be treated with an acceptable rate of late loss success, surgical treatment still constitutes a widespread therapeutic option, especially with multi-vessel disease and diabetic patients. The more data that results from randomized studies on methods and equipment, the more we realize how much we really need a good dedicated DES bifurcation stent. Currently, there are dedicated DES bifurcation stents11 waiting for FDA approval, and others still being developed, such as the bio-degradable or bioabsorbable metallic stents.12 Until then, it is comforting to know that we have the ability to utilize the strategies and techniques for our workhorse stents to keep us away from the surgeon. Again, we don’t endorse or advocate the use of any of these strategies. We suggest that the reader conduct his/her own research. This article is only a reference guide to some of the strategies utilized at various seminars and courses. We recommend that anyone interested in getting more information seek out this article’s references, or visit: www.tctmd.com www.europcronline.com www.pubmed.com www.webmd.com www.invasivecardiology.com On these websites, the reader will be able to find more information on the equipment used and different techniques on these strategies and their relative restenosis rates. Acknowledgements Dr. Paul Teirstein’s expertise with bifurcating lesions prompted me to write this article and share some of these very innovative techniques, and, hopefully help others in our field understand the different strategies that various interventionalists are using for complex bifurcation lesions. I would like to thank my wife Christine (Shu-lung) for her cartoon illustrations, drawn to help describe these techniques (a picture is worth a thousand words!). My thanks to Dr. Howard Elkin for the pictures of his Backstop procedure. He recently informed me that this 61-year-old male was previously unable to go on the treadmill for more than three minutes because of chest pain. After the backstop procedure, his treadmill test is negative and he is now a very happy, active person. Finally, I would like to thank the excellent cath lab staff and cardiologists at Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Whittier, California, for their expertise and encouragement for me to write this article. Please download the pdf for the continuing education quiz and form. Thank you!

References
1. Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, et al. Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions: A rational approach. J Interv Cardiol 2001 Dec;14(6): 573-585.

2. Sheiban I, Albiero R, Marsico F, et al. Immediate and long-term results of "T" stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol 2000 May 1;85(9):1141-1144, A9.

3. Teirstein P. From www.tctmd.com. New Slide Presentation Pool (November 2005) -Unprotected Left Main and Bifurcation Lesions: Latest Techniques and Outcomes.

4. Sharma SK, et al. From www.tctmd.com. Abstracts (2003) - Approaches to Bifurcation Intervention - Treatment Strategy for True Bifurcation Lesions in Medium-to-Large Size Vessels: Simultaneous Kissing Stents Technique.

5. Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the culotte technique. Am J Cardiol 1998 Oct 15;82(8):943-949.

6. Daemen J, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Multi-Lesion Culotte and Crush Bifurcation Stenting with Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Long-Term Angiographic Outcome. J Invas Cardiol Nov 2003;15(11): 653-656.

7. Colombo A, Spanos V. Commentary: A New Technique for Coronary Bifurcations: Good News! J Invas Cardiol 2003;15(4): 184-185.

8. Assali AR, Teplitsky I, Hasdai D. Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: To stent one branch or both? J Invas Cardiol 2004;16(9):447-450.

9. Szabo S, Abramowitz B, Viatkus PT. TCT 2005 Abstract no. 548: New techniques for Aorto-Ostial Stent Placement. Am J Cardiol 2005:96 (suppl):212H.

10. Lo H, Kern MJ. Use of a branch wire to anchor stents for exact placement proximal to bifurcation stents: The reverse Szabo technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006 Apr 30. Found on www.pubmed.com (in press).

11. Kereiakes DJ. From www.tctmd. com. New Slide Presentation Pool (November 2005) - The DES of Tomorrow - New Dedicated Bifurcation Stents and More. Branch-Vessel Stenting: The Next Horizon. Scripps Interventional Course 2005, La Jolla, California.

12. Koolen J, Heublein B. From www.tctmd.com. Expert Presentations Pool (December 2003) - Bioabsorbable Metallic Stents. Magnesium Based Alloys - Only Degradation or More?

/sites/cathlabdigest.com/files/18-23_CLD0606_LunsfordCEU.pdf